Royal London Sterling Extra Yield Bond: June 2025 fund update

• Co-manager Eric Holt is a seasoned bond investor with over three decades of investment experience

• The fund invests across the bond market, including in higher-risk unrated bonds

• The fund has performed well since its launch in 2003, outperforming its IA Strategic Bond peer group

• The fund does not currently feature on the Wealth Shortlist of funds chosen by our analysts for their long-term performance potential

How it fits in a portfolio

The Royal London Sterling Extra Yield Bond fund offers the potential to deliver a high income for investors, but its investment approach means it’s also higher risk. The fund could be used to diversify a bond investment portfolio, or a more adventurous shares portfolio seeking exposure to other asset classes. We think the fund could be more volatile than some other bond funds.

Please note as an offshore fund you are not normally entitled to compensation through the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme.

Manager

The fund is co-managed by the experienced Eric Holt and Rachid Semaoune. Holt joined Royal London in 1999 and his investment career stretches over three decades. He’s managed the fund since its launch in 2003 and also has responsibility for Royal London’s credit research process.

Semaoune began his investment career in 2001 at Gulf International Bank before later joining UBS Asset Management to manage investment grade bond portfolios. He joined Royal London in 2015 and became co-manager of this fund in 2019.

Holt and Semaoune also have the help of a team of analysts and other fund managers at Royal London and both managers also run other fixed income funds.

Process

The managers look for opportunities across the credit market by investing in a combination of investment grade, sub-investment grade and unrated bonds (bonds without a credit rating) where they believe valuations are attractive. They don’t rely on credit ratings and consider if the reward on offer is sufficient for the risk of owning a bond. As of the end of May 2025, 32.8% of the fund was invested in unrated bonds.

This is a meaningful amount of the fund invested in unrated bonds. These under-researched bonds may be complex and often secured against a company's assets. The managers can potentially add value by investing in this area of the market, but these types of bonds are higher risk, and the lack of credit rating can make them harder to trade, adding liquidity risk (the ease at which you can buy or sell an investment), particularly in a falling market. It’s because of this that the fund does not feature on the Wealth Shortlist of funds chosen by our analysts for their long-term performance potential.

The managers tend to focus more on the prospects for individual bonds, rather than taking wider views on things like duration (a bond's sensitivity to a change in interest rates). Holt and Semaoune therefore aim to add value for investors by investing in bonds others don't fully understand that they think could go on to perform well in the future. They hold a wide range of bonds in the fund, so returns don't rely on the performance of a single investment. The fund invests in high-yield and unrated bonds, both of which can increase risk.

Holt and Semaoune have been active in identifying new opportunities to add to the fund. Recent investments include the newly issued bonds from AVIVA, the UK insurer, and Motability, a UK lease car provider for disabled individuals and their carers. The managers also invested in some bonds from Barclays and Coventry & Rugby Hospital. They sold some bonds from the Co-op Bank and insurer Phoenix Group.

The managers think that inflation could remain at current levels, which is lower than the peak in recent years. There’s potential for interest rate cuts from central banks, but they think it’s unlikely that rates will go as low as they did during the covid pandemic.

Culture

We believe Royal London’s speciality is in managing fixed income portfolios. Their philosophy is that all well-diversified portfolios should include an element of income. They use a combination of top-down macroeconomic analysis and bottom-up security selection to manage their bond portfolios which has served them well over time.

The managers are rewarded based on the long-term performance of their fund, so their interests are aligned with investors. We think their incentivisation structure is better than most and encourages good behaviour, but it isn’t as long term as in some other groups.

ESG Integration

The managers consider environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors in their analysis. This helps them identify potential risks that could affect the business’s ability to repay its debts, increase costs or result in future litigation.

All Royal London fund managers have access to ESG ratings and analysis produced by the firm’s central Responsible Investment team. The firm asks that all managers incorporate this into their investment decision making processes, but our meetings with Royal London fund managers suggest the quality of ESG integration from fund to fund is mixed. The firm’s sustainability branded funds fully integrate ESG, with the support of the Responsible Investment team.

The Responsible Investment team coordinates company engagement and engagement case studies can be found in the firm’s annual Stewardship and Responsible Investment report. The firm also publishes a summary of voting activity on its website, and an interface allows visitors to search for all voting activity relating to a specific company, or any time period, and includes a rationale in cases where the team voted against a proposal or abstained.

While this is not one of Royal London’s sustainability branded funds, we think that ESG related risks are suitably considered as part of the bond selection process. That said, the fund may still hold bonds from industries such as tobacco or oil & gas.

Cost

This fund has an ongoing annual charge of 0.84%, but we've secured HL clients an ongoing saving of 0.44%. This means you pay a net ongoing charge of 0.40%. The HL platform fee of up to 0.45% per year also applies, except in the HL Junior ISA, where no platform fee applies.

Performance

Holt has delivered good returns to investors over the long term. Since the fund’s launch in April 2003, he’s delivered returns of 351.07%* , compared with the IA £ Strategic Bond peer group average return of 176.33%. Past performance is not a guide to the future. All investments fall as well as rise in value, so you could get back less than you invest.

Over the 12 months to the end of May 2025, the fund has delivered a return of 10.21%, ahead of the IA £ Strategic Bond peer group average return of 6.64%.

Investments in bonds from the banks and financial services sector provided strong returns for the fund over the period. Bonds from insurance companies also performed well, as did holdings from the industrials sector. These sectors made up a large part of the fund over the period, so it’s not surprising they have a big influence on overall performance.

From a credit rating perspective, high yield, investment grade and unrated bonds have all delivered positive returns.

At an issuer level, bonds from Santander, Metro Bank and Intu Metrocentre, performed particularly well.

Some bonds lost value though. Some of the biggest losses came from bonds issued by the Thames Water owner, Kemble Water Limited. The ongoing challenges around financing for the company proved challenging for the value of their bonds. Bonds from Sunborn Finance Oyj, a Finnish hotel services company, also performed poorly.

The fund can be more volatile than other bond funds, which we saw during the 2008 financial crisis and at the start of 2020 amid the coronavirus pandemic. This means we don't think the fund is likely to offer shelter in an economic or bond market downturn.

Investments in some areas of the market that other investors tend to overlook, like unrated and higher yielding bonds have helped deliver strong returns for investors in the fund. But these investments are less liquid, meaning they can be more difficult to trade in large volumes, particularly during challenging market conditions or shocks.

At the end of April, the fund had a yield of 6.5%, although yields are variable, not guaranteed, and are not a reliable indicator of future income.