Skip to main content
  • Register
  • Help
  • Contact us
  • Log out of your HL account
Growth versus value


Growth versus value

Managers' thoughts

Important information - The value of this fund can still fall so you could get back less than you invested, especially over the short term. The information shown is not personal advice and the information about individual companies represents our view as managers of the fund. It is not a personal recommendation to invest in a particular company. If you are at all unsure of the suitability of an investment for your circumstances please contact us for personal advice.
Charlie Huggins

Charlie Huggins (CFA) - Fund Manager

31 August 2018

There are many ways to go about investing but, in the end, investors all want the same thing.

To buy a business for less than it’s worth.

One method is to try and buy a business trading on a low valuation and sell it when the valuation rises. This is known as a ‘value-based’ approach and some investors we admire employ this technique very successfully.

However, it's not our style. We prefer to pay up for high quality businesses with strong growth prospects, and once we have found them we seek to hold their shares for the long term.

Why we favour growth over value

First and foremost, a ‘value-based’ approach isn’t a style that suits us. Our skill set is much more suited to identifying great businesses that are likely to stay great, rather than businesses with room for improvement.

When buying businesses which are going through tough times for what you might think are bargain prices, it can be easy to underestimate the challenges these businesses face in turning around their fortunes.

Secondly, time is the friend of the wonderful business and the enemy of the mediocre.

A company that isn’t growing or is in decline is getting less valuable every day, so timing the entry and exit becomes very important. By contrast, a good business that’s growing its profits becomes more and more valuable as the years go by.

If we’re right about the quality of the business we can let compounding work its magic without overly worrying about changes in valuation or getting our timing slightly wrong. This approach also minimises trading costs.

An investor who looks to benefit from valuation changes will typically sell as soon as their estimate of ‘fair value’ has been reached. They then have to redeploy the proceeds into another business. To us this is a more difficult and costly way to go about things than just holding good businesses for years.

Lastly, value investors need to be very careful to avoid what’s known as ‘value traps’ when analysing businesses which may look undervalued.

If a company is trading on an unusually low valuation, it may be because sentiment is irrationally depressed (a potential opportunity) but more often than not it’s a sign of deep-rooted problems.

We think the UK stock market is filled with potential value-traps right now owing to the speed with which digital business models are disrupting traditional incumbents. The most obvious example is the impact of e-commerce on high street retailers but there are many others (see Steve’s recent article on digital disruption).

Our focus on quality businesses with strong growth prospects naturally steers us away from such situations.

The power of compounding

Changes in valuation do have an impact on stock market returns, especially in the short term. But, over longer periods compound growth in profits has by far the bigger impact.

The easiest way to show this is through an example. The chart below shows the return from two companies, A and B, over 20 years after an initial investment of £1,000 in each.

Company A grows at 2% per year and its valuation increases from a P/E of 15 to 20. Company B on the other hand grows faster, at 10% per year, but sees its valuation fall from a P/E of 20 to 15.

Source: HL. This illustration is an example.

Company A, the slower growing firm, starts off as the better investment because the impact of valuation overcomes the effect of slower compounding. However, the difference in monetary terms is reasonably small.

Over the longer time periods company B wins comfortably – the decrease in valuation is over-powered by the faster compound growth. Notice that as the time period is extended the winning margin between A and B widens out further and further.

Please remember, unlike the above examples, all investments fall as well as rise in value, so you could get back less than you invest.

In our experience investors often get too hung-up on short term valuation changes and underestimate the power of long term compounding. This means great businesses can trade on lower prices than they really should.

Take Unilever, for example. It’s out-performed the FTSE All Share by a wide margin over 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 years, although past performance isn’t a guide to future returns. In a so-called ‘efficient’ market this shouldn’t happen.

It suggests that Unilever shares have been undervalued over the last three decades. In other words, investors consistently underestimated its future cash flows, despite the inherent predictability of its business model.

Why would high quality businesses be undervalued?

It may seem odd to suggest that the best businesses in the stock market are often undervalued – surely investors would be clamouring for these stocks?

Sometimes they do, especially with fast-growing, hyped-up sectors. But it’s much less common for the steady-eddies that reliably grow their profits in a measured way.

One reason for this is that investors are naturally reluctant to look more than a few years ahead when forecasting growth in a company’s ability to generate cash. It’s understandable because most companies have tended to perform well in bursts but revert back to a relatively consistent average over time.

However, some exceptional businesses, like Unilever, have defied the odds although there are no guarantees this will continue. Our job is to try and identify businesses like this with sustainable competitive advantages, where investors underestimate their future prospects. It’s not straightforward, and we won’t always get it right, but on average we believe it’s a winning approach.

Behavioural bias also plays a big part. It’s human nature to seek out a bargain, which means investors often go fishing in bombed out parts of the market. They’re reluctant to pay-up for quality because if the share price has gone up recently, people might become hesitant, thinking it’s had a good run already. Even if the higher share price is more than justified by improving business fundamentals the temptation is to ‘wait for a better entry point’.

Finally, many investors nowadays have very short investment horizons. The average holding period for stocks trading on the New York Stock Exchange, for example, has declined to an astonishing 8 months.

Short term investors care much more about changes in valuation than the quality, culture and long term growth prospects for a business. This means high quality businesses can frequently be overlooked, creating opportunities for patient investors like us.

In fact I would go so far as to say that a long term investment horizon, measured in years not months, is one of our biggest advantages.

More about HL Select UK Growth Shares

More about HL Select UK Income Shares

Read more blog articles

Important - This article is not advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any investment. No view is given on the present or future value or price of any investment, and investors should form their own view on any proposed investment. This article has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is considered a marketing communication. Non-independent research is not subject to FCA rules prohibiting dealing ahead of research, however HL has put controls in place (including dealing restrictions, physical and information barriers) to manage potential conflicts of interest presented by such dealing. Please see our full non-independent research disclosure for more information. Unless otherwise stated estimates, including prospective yields, are a consensus of analyst forecasts from Bloomberg. They are not a reliable indicator of future performance. Yields are variable and not guaranteed.